Severe, eosinophilic asthma in primary care in Canada: a longitudinal study of the clinical burden and economic impact based on linked electronic medical record data

Don Husereau, Jason GoodfieldRichard LeighRichard BorrelliMichel Cloutier and Alain Gendron

Abstract

Background

Stratification of patients with severe asthma by blood eosinophil counts predicts responders to anti-interleukin (IL)-5 (mepolizumab and reslizumab) and anti-IL-5 receptor α (benralizumab) therapies. This study characterized patients with severe asthma who could qualify for these biologics in a primary care setting.

Methods

We retrospectively selected patients from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2014, using a linked electronic medical records (EMR) database (IMS Evidence 360 EMR Canada) for > 950,000 patients in primary care in Ontario, Canada. Patients aged ≥ 12 years with ≥ 2 documented asthma diagnoses were identified as having severe asthma based on prescriptions for high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus either a leukotriene receptor antagonist, long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), or theophylline filled on the same day. Patients’ asthma was considered severe also if they received a prescription for ICS with oral corticosteroids (OCS) or an additional prescription for omalizumab. Patient characteristics, asthma-related medications, and blood eosinophil counts were captured using observed care patterns for the year prior to ICS/LABA and/or OCS prescription. Health care resource use (HCRU) and costs were captured throughout the 1-year follow-up period.

Results

We identified 212 patients who met the criteria for severe asthma. These patients required an average of 6.5 physician visits during the 1-year follow-up period (95% confidence interval 5.7–7.3), and 20 (9%) were referred to respiratory specialists. Overall, 56 patients (26%) with severe asthma had complete blood counts, of whom 23 (41%) had blood eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/μL and might be considered for anti-eosinophil therapies. Patients with severe asthma and blood eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/μL had more respiratory specialist referrals (17% vs. 12%) than patients with blood eosinophils < 300 cells/μL.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that during 2010–2014, Ontario primary care patients with severe asthma and high blood eosinophil counts had greater HRCU than those with lower counts. Approximately 41% of patients with severe asthma could qualify for anti-eosinophil drugs based on blood eosinophil counts. However, the eosinophilic status of most patients was unknown. It is appropriate to increase awareness of the use of blood eosinophil counts to identify patients who could be considered for anti-eosinophil therapies.

Download PDF

(You must be logged in to add and reply comments)

Interasma on Twitter

Interasma Top story: RSVP to the Back-to-School Twitter Party https://t.co/kfgS8pRncS, see more https://t.co/CpGiFuOOYd
7hreplyretweetfavorite
Interasma Top story: Three Common Comorbidities With Asthma https://t.co/UfB8hfM3H4, see more https://t.co/CpGiFuOOYd
10hreplyretweetfavorite
Interasma RT @ARIAGuideline: This article summarizes a EUFOREA symposium, presented during the European Rhinology Research Forum in Brussels (9-10 No…
16hreplyretweetfavorite
Interasma RT @ARIAGuideline: Rhinology future trends: 2017 EUFOREA debate on allergic rhinitis. https://t.co/ZMAchhHdBx
16hreplyretweetfavorite
Interasma RT @Aller_MD: Weekly Clinical Case Challenge from Derm101 https://t.co/TE5QVugg7W
16hreplyretweetfavorite

Editor: Juan C. Ivancevich, MD

Copyright © Interasma 2003-2017  •  Terms of Use  •  Privacy Policy  •  Contact Us  •  Sitemap

Powered by FREI SA

InterAsma